
We accept advertising through Blogads. If you're interested, click the "Advertise here" link above, or go here to place your ad through Blogads. For assistance, e-mail me here; I'd be glad to help. Reach lots of viewers -- we're up to about 3,800 unique visits a day, and more than 61,000 page views a week (as of November 4). Our rates are dirt cheap for the exposure you'll get!
As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
Cameron, Chardonnay
B.R. Cohn, Cabernet, Silver Label 2006
Graffigna, Cabernet 2005
Palo Alto, Reserve Red 2008
Menguante, Garnacha 2008
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Felsina Berardenga, Vin Santo 1997
Anne Amie, Pinot Gris 2009
McKinley Springs, Bombing Ramge Red 2007
Vieux Papes Red
Dionysius Chardonnay 2009
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2009
Vega Montan, Mencia 2008
Chateau la Vernede, Coteaux du Languedoc 2007
Mount Defiance, Hellfire (White) 2008
Root: 1, Cabernet 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Pinot Grigio 2009
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 White, 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 Rose, 2007
Abacela, Grenache Rose 2009
Avia Cabernet 2004
Lemelson Pinot Noir, Thea's Selection 2007
Chateau de la Roulerie, Rose d'Anjou 2009
Casal Garcia, Vinho Verde Rose
La Ferme Julien, Rose 2008
Cana's Feast, Bricco Red, 2006
Hogue, Genesis Merlot, 2008
Owen Roe, Sharecropper's Cabernet, 2008
Kim Crawford, Unoaked Chardonnay 2008
J. Scott, Pinot Noir 2008
Edmunds St. John, White, Heart of Gold 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2006
Stevenot, Cabernet, Sierra Foothills, "Stanford" 2000
Portuga, Vinho Rose 2009
Taylor Fladgate, First Estate Reserve Porto
Franciscan, Cabernet, Napa 2006
Chaparral de Vega Sindoa, Garnacha 2008
Quinta da Aveleda, Vinho Verde 2008
St. Francis, Chardonnay Sonoma 2008
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone Blanc, 2007
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Noir 2008
St. Innocent, Pinot Noir 2006
Jigsaw, Pinot Noir 2007
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Indian Wells 2007
Charles Shaw, Chardonnay 2008
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Rosé 2009
Cameron, Willamette Valley Chardonnay
Il Valore, Sangiovese, Giovane, Puglia 2008
Duck Pond, Chardonnay, Wahluke Slope 2007
Kim Crawford, Marlborough Pinot Noir 2008
Domaine du Pesquier, Cotes du Rhone 2005
Cantina Zaccagnini, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo 2006
Domaine Matrot, Chardonnay, Bourgogne 2007
David Hill, Oregon Sparkling Wine, Brut
Chandler Reach, Monte Regalo 2006
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2008
Kirkland, Columbia Valley Merlot 2008
D'Aragon, Old Vine Garnacha 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2005
Pavin & Riley, Merlot 2006
David Hill, Estate Pinot Noir, Barrel Select 2006
Castle Rock, Paso Robles Cabernet 2006
Magnificent, Cabernet, Steak House 2008
Conundrum 2008
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Saint Cosme, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
La Granja, Tempranillo 360, 2008
Santa Rita, Mendalla Real Cabernet 2006
Columbia Crest, Grand Estates Merlot 2006
Andezon, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
Collegiata, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo
Troon, Druid's Fluid 2008
La Granja, Tempranillo 2008
Monte Antico, Toscana 2006
Vieux Papes, Blanc de Blancs
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Miles run year to date: 26
At this date last year: 15
Total run in 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (23)
The $64,000 question: how do you provide adequate services to local homeless while not putting out the welcome mat for homeless in other cities that are less hospitable?
You know something is wrong when homeless people all up the West Coast know that Portland is the place to come for services, while parents all up the West Coast know that Portland is the place to avoid if you want your kids to go to local public schools.
Pretty sad.
Posted by Dave J. | September 26, 2005 7:04 PM
The problem should be pretty obvious, or at least I think so. Pioneer Courthouse Square is Portland's "outdoor living room." Big suprise the rest of downtown becomes Portland's "outdoor bathroom."
Posted by Brian | September 26, 2005 8:44 PM
"Imagine if all the retail and restaurant energy in the Pearl had been steered downtown -- what strength that would have created." And who would have done the steering? And isn't such steering, or efforts at it, something you have routinely complained about in this blog. The Pearl wasn't steered into existence, and it hasn't sucked anything out of downtown that wasn't already going. And what's happening on N. Mississippi and NE Alberta is not a matter or steering or policy. Compared to almost any where Portland has done well; our city lives and grows and is fun (as you occaisonally concede) to live in and walk around. As for the homeless, less compassion and more police is definitely not the answer. If we could restore the level of service our community provided to the mentally ill 30 years ago we wouldn't have them standing on the freeway exits and panhandling on every corner downtown.
Posted by ed jones | September 26, 2005 8:55 PM
There's been massive steering, all right -- into the Pearl.
Posted by Jack Bog | September 26, 2005 9:11 PM
BTW, I agree that woefully ineffective mental health treatment is part of the problem. But it's the combination of the mentally ill and the anti-social that can make a walk around downtown such an unpleasant adventure.
Posted by Jack Bog | September 26, 2005 9:16 PM
I drove by the new Central City Concern PAHC program this morning at 7:30 and 40 - 50 people were queued up, waiting for their treatments, all as tidy as they could be, all sober and getting better. There are programs that work here - and programs which basically don't. We invest evenly in both. A couple of years ago the state decided it would SLOWLY begin to shift purchasing toward evidence-based treatments (versus those which are simply flibbertigibbet). Made sure it was SLOW.
PAHC is at http://www.centralcityconcern.org/pahc.htm
Those in the good programs know they've got a good thing - the counselors at PAHC are former clients. The program is sticky because its based in reality and death, jails and the madhouse are the alternatives.
It's in our best interest, as lovers of a great city, to invest in systems which work and to can the bureaucrats who pander and connive. CCC is a nonprofit, your contribution is tax-deductible.
The history of corruption is long, and vulgar.
See Doug Bates’ comment on Sunday at http://www.oregonlive.com/editorials/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/editorial/1127559748271250.xml&coll=7
Posted by Cicolini | September 26, 2005 9:37 PM
...thereby helping to eliminate the urine smell that seeps into the structure's concrete...
I remember when the solution to these problems used to be this quaint commodity called police coverage. Ah, those were the days..
Yeah...but I also remember when there were places to pee. When we don't have public restrooms, we create a problem that tends to resolve itself unpleasantly.
Retail may or may not be suffering (small businesses always come and go), but there seems no shortage of folks downtown at night, and they're not all hanging out at Voodoo Donuts.
Posted by Frank Dufay | September 26, 2005 10:26 PM
CCC is doing a great job with what it has.
Posted by Jack Bog | September 26, 2005 10:34 PM
You think that more police would stop transients from pissing in the alleyways? Really?
Posted by Arne Saknussemm | September 26, 2005 10:58 PM
You think that more police would stop transients from pissing in the alleyways? Really?
Actually, yes. In the heart of downtown, in broad daylight, on the steps of the parking garages, yes.
Posted by Jack Bog | September 27, 2005 2:33 AM
If I owned a parking garage I wouldn't even allow Portland's "finest" to enter. I'd hire my own private security.
Posted by RAH | September 27, 2005 6:50 AM
Downtown has been dying a slow death for six years. Jobs in the core are down from 110 thousand to 80 thousand in that time period. Large employers continue to flee the city and county. Meanwhile, the "wagon wheel" design of the Tri-Met system is mostly geared toward getting people downtown and back home again. Downtown retail and food and beverage is hanging on by the fingernails, but tearing everything up for the overhaul of the transit mall should pretty well finish them off.
Posted by Dave Lister | September 27, 2005 7:54 AM
The .com boom was still running six years ago, so that's not a particularly good time to compare against.
Posted by David Parsons | September 27, 2005 9:05 AM
I'm not sure, but I don't think the bulk of the lost jobs had to do with internet endeavors. The Portland Business Alliance could probably give you good statistics, but I'm thinking of big headquarters... GP, LP, US Bank... etc.
Posted by Dave Lister | September 27, 2005 9:36 AM
If the market is working, there can't be a shortage of monthly parking users downtown. My monthly rate keeps going up, even though we've switched lots twice in the last two years to find cheaper rates.
Posted by Kai Jones | September 27, 2005 10:52 AM
I wonder how many of those large (non-internet related) corporations who have a significant downtown presence have hedged their bets in recent years by quietly investing in future development property away from the chaos? I know of at least one which has moved several hundred employees out to Washington County in recent years and has plenty of land to accommodate the rest.
Renee Mitchell's recent column hit it on the head - for too many working women Portland's downtown has become more than a little uncomfortable and they are communicating this to their employers.
But looking on the bright side, the desire of local planners to achieve a european city ambiance seems much closer these days - les urinateurs are thriving in Portland.
Posted by Ronald M | September 27, 2005 12:22 PM
(1) The Problem: who do you blame? Vera? She led our city for years....is this one aspect of that stewardship? Tom? PDC? Blame the citizens for lack of support to social services community? Dunno, Jack, it's your call...serving you a softball here(fingerpointing is all the rage in the big easy). Remember too, some folks who live on the street (sadly) like it that way, and resist any/all efforts to help them. Frustrating.
(2) The Solution: same fingerpointing applies..who's obligation is it - Tom Potter? PBA? Not taking action....is action in and of itself. Let's play Elimina-Hero. See who's left to lead us out of this situation. But with all commentary aside, seriously speaking - who/what is the solution?
Posted by got logic? | September 27, 2005 2:38 PM
Here are seven quickies to solving some of the downtown people mess.
1. Remove all pay phones which can receive incoming calls.
2. Move Allied Methadone (over Rich's) out of downtown.
3. Give a recovery-oriented reward to police officers publicly in addiction recovery themselves.
4. Buy small print advertisements in the home town papers of convicted drug dealers, listing their name, the names of their home town family members, their crime, their picture, their school, whatever. Shame on you!
5. Develop downtown business strategy to identify, pursue and chase out streetcorner drug dealers. There's no excuse for 5th and Burnside, other than the local businesses have no outdoor presence and the police consider the principle "it's gonna happen somewhere." This is pre-broken-window thinking and stupid.
6. Not popular but enforce the "no sit" rule as needed. Not for our regular crazy people who live downtown and aren't harming anyone, or for political protesters who are entertaining, or for Street Roots vendors who deserve a break, but instead for the filthy wastrels who parade and jabber and beg and wander. If you like, pick a "safe zone" where anyone can sleep, camp, rest, whatever.
7. Properly fund AND MANAGE our city shelters. There are people who have been living at TPI for a decade. The staff there, juvenile and morally stunted, refuse to set limits or provide alternatives. The BOD there shortchanges the homeless as much as the city does by chronically under funding TPI and other smaller shelters.
I could go on, but, um, I've got my own blog to rant in.
Posted by cicolini | September 27, 2005 4:34 PM
Note also that the architects doing the work for PDC on the makeover of the 10th Ave Smart Park are suggesting that the MAX station be moved 2 blocks west in order to help revive the retail scene. Whatever happened to the idea that light rail is a so-called "catalyst for urban development", as the planners like to describe it.
Come to think of it, that site has light rail on 2 sides and the streetcar on a third. According to the theory, it should be a retail gold mine. Instead we've got Peterson's 24-hour quick mart catering to the transients.
John Charles
Posted by John Charles | September 27, 2005 6:41 PM
That makes the planned light rail transit mall insane.
Especially with the PDC, TriMet and Metro ushering it along with reckless abandonment.
It's too bad accountability has been effectively abolished just as traffic engineering has around here.
Otherwise some individuals would face some consequences what these agencies do.
Posted by Steve Schopp | September 27, 2005 9:38 PM
To pay for this fancy new transit mall that nobody cares about (cause it's still gonna be full of drug dealers), they raise the meter rates and extend the hours till 7:00pm. The end result with the people that come visit me is they wait until after 7. Same with going out to dinner or whatever. So let's see, end result is less people pay for parking, which means city makes less money in the long run and business depending on evening traffic do less. Yeah, that's forward thinking.
Posted by PdxFoodDude | September 27, 2005 11:01 PM
The idea that the Pearl district sucked the life out of downtown seems to rest on some faulty logic. I don't think it's a zero sum game. In fact, I think the more people live in an area, the better the general real estate climate.
But I guess we can just try to stick the whole thing in amber, and see what happens then.
Posted by Portland Publius | September 28, 2005 1:23 AM
I don't think it's a zero sum game.
I do. Stagnant economy, high unemployment, population within the city limts declining, crime and homeless problems making ugly headlines on a regular basis -- hardly a time to give shoppers and diners a dozen more reasons not to go downtown. The numbers of restaurant meals sold and dollars spent in retail in Portland are not going up anywhere near fast enough to justify overbuilding retail in several new neighborhoods at once. And in case you haven't noticed, the creative geniuses in COP Planning insist on new retail on the ground floor of every junky condo box that's being slapped up anywhere in town. It's a witches' brew.
Posted by Jack Bog | September 28, 2005 2:38 AM