
We accept advertising through Blogads. If you're interested, click the "Advertise here" link above, or go here to place your ad through Blogads. For assistance, e-mail me here; I'd be glad to help. Reach lots of viewers -- we're up to about 3,800 unique visits a day, and more than 61,000 page views a week (as of November 4). Our rates are dirt cheap for the exposure you'll get!
As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
Cameron, Chardonnay
B.R. Cohn, Cabernet, Silver Label 2006
Graffigna, Cabernet 2005
Palo Alto, Reserve Red 2008
Menguante, Garnacha 2008
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Felsina Berardenga, Vin Santo 1997
Anne Amie, Pinot Gris 2009
McKinley Springs, Bombing Ramge Red 2007
Vieux Papes Red
Dionysius Chardonnay 2009
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2009
Vega Montan, Mencia 2008
Chateau la Vernede, Coteaux du Languedoc 2007
Mount Defiance, Hellfire (White) 2008
Root: 1, Cabernet 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Pinot Grigio 2009
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 White, 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 Rose, 2007
Abacela, Grenache Rose 2009
Avia Cabernet 2004
Lemelson Pinot Noir, Thea's Selection 2007
Chateau de la Roulerie, Rose d'Anjou 2009
Casal Garcia, Vinho Verde Rose
La Ferme Julien, Rose 2008
Cana's Feast, Bricco Red, 2006
Hogue, Genesis Merlot, 2008
Owen Roe, Sharecropper's Cabernet, 2008
Kim Crawford, Unoaked Chardonnay 2008
J. Scott, Pinot Noir 2008
Edmunds St. John, White, Heart of Gold 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2006
Stevenot, Cabernet, Sierra Foothills, "Stanford" 2000
Portuga, Vinho Rose 2009
Taylor Fladgate, First Estate Reserve Porto
Franciscan, Cabernet, Napa 2006
Chaparral de Vega Sindoa, Garnacha 2008
Quinta da Aveleda, Vinho Verde 2008
St. Francis, Chardonnay Sonoma 2008
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone Blanc, 2007
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Noir 2008
St. Innocent, Pinot Noir 2006
Jigsaw, Pinot Noir 2007
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Indian Wells 2007
Charles Shaw, Chardonnay 2008
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Rosé 2009
Cameron, Willamette Valley Chardonnay
Il Valore, Sangiovese, Giovane, Puglia 2008
Duck Pond, Chardonnay, Wahluke Slope 2007
Kim Crawford, Marlborough Pinot Noir 2008
Domaine du Pesquier, Cotes du Rhone 2005
Cantina Zaccagnini, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo 2006
Domaine Matrot, Chardonnay, Bourgogne 2007
David Hill, Oregon Sparkling Wine, Brut
Chandler Reach, Monte Regalo 2006
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2008
Kirkland, Columbia Valley Merlot 2008
D'Aragon, Old Vine Garnacha 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2005
Pavin & Riley, Merlot 2006
David Hill, Estate Pinot Noir, Barrel Select 2006
Castle Rock, Paso Robles Cabernet 2006
Magnificent, Cabernet, Steak House 2008
Conundrum 2008
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Saint Cosme, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
La Granja, Tempranillo 360, 2008
Santa Rita, Mendalla Real Cabernet 2006
Columbia Crest, Grand Estates Merlot 2006
Andezon, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
Collegiata, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo
Troon, Druid's Fluid 2008
La Granja, Tempranillo 2008
Monte Antico, Toscana 2006
Vieux Papes, Blanc de Blancs
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Miles run year to date: 26
At this date last year: 15
Total run in 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (17)
For more:
Here.
And here.
Posted by Jack Bog | October 19, 2006 11:18 PM
“It appeared, it appeared that Officer Humphreys kind of landed slightly off of the subject,”
...kind of like the grand jury investigation...
Posted by Don Smith | October 19, 2006 11:41 PM
But I thought Sizer stated publicly that the PPB was "disappointed" by the delay in the grand jury's decision because they "have been anxious to share all of the factual information regarding this investigation."
When will liars learn that the less said the better. The more these "leaders" say, the deeper hole they dig for themselves.
Posted by Madam Hatter | October 20, 2006 12:33 AM
The official version is finally out. Maximum Maxine has it here.
Posted by Jack Bog | October 20, 2006 2:36 AM
"I pulled my right foot back and kicked him in the upper chest," Nice said.
O.K. now we are getting somewhere. A high velocity boot stomp to the chest of a person laying on the ground could easily break several ribs. I had one rib fractured this way by a bare foot opponent in a martial arts tournament, and he was (supposedly) trying to control his kick in an effort to not seriously hurt me. It doesn't seem reasonable to conclude that the initial fall to the ground caused anything more than superficial injuries.
I doubt that paramedics were told that Mr. Chasse started his blood curdling screams and then lost consciousness soon after the stomp fest. I just can't get over how the cops can claim that they missed the fact that Mr. Chasse was seriously injured because the rib fractures had to have been causing him excruciating pain. Also screaming when you have 16 broken ribs and a punctured lung would make the pain unbearable. He probably passed out from the pain (shock)since there doesn't seem to be any documentation of any kind of serious head injury. Boot stomped to death by the police...hell of a way to die.
Posted by Kevin | October 20, 2006 4:14 AM
I still want to know if Potter really didn't get called, who on his staff got fired?
Posted by J. Smalls | October 20, 2006 7:44 AM
Brutality aside, Ms. Bernstein's scenario points up a paradoxically stunning degree of sheer ignorance among some local public safety employees, and evidently, some AMT EMTs.
Unconsciousness means that something very severe has happened to the brainstem. Sometimes it's from head trauma or epilepsy; sometimes it's having no blood sugar, oxygen or blood flow in the brain; and sometimes it's because of medications, drugs or chemicals.
Unconsciousness means all life sustaining backup systems are about to fail, such as automatic breathing, heart function and keeping vomit out of the lungs. In short, once one is unconscious, the only thing yet to occur is death.
Anybody who becomes unconscious needs to be evaluated by a doctor...an MD.
Temporarily regaining consciousness is a good sign, but it doesn't rule out progression of an underlying lethal problem.
This is information simple enough that that any grade school graduate could learn it, understand it and apply it in everyday life.
I only write this in the hope someone might benefit from the perspective.
Posted by WoodburnBob | October 20, 2006 7:57 AM
James Chasse was murdered by three men who happened to have badges and that's the bottom line. The rest is just extra garbage diverting you from that bottom line. I've been posting contact info for Rosie Sizer and the Independent Police Reivew on various forums and blogs this morning because it's really time to make our displeasure known. I'm not a criminal, but when I see a cop I tend to walk the other way too, is that grounds for a beating, possibly death? I don't think so. If you don't either, write or call:
Independent Police Review:
1221 SW 4th Ave, Rm 320
Portland, OR 97204
phone: 503-823-0146
fax: 503-823-3530
iprcrc@ci.portland.or.us
Chief Rosie Sizer:
Chief's Office Phone, 503-823-0000
Chief's Office Fax, 503-823-0342
chiefsizer@portlandpolice.org
Posted by Chris | October 20, 2006 8:39 AM
Throughout the fight, Chasse uttered what Humphreys called a "blood-curdling" open-mouthed scream, like "Aaah!" and screamed "No" three times.
Help me out on this one, because my Googling is failing me. I have a very very distinct recollection of an early story in this case reporting that the officers had said they thought Chasse was yelling "no" because he was afraid the cops were going to take his backpack. Today's article, based on the interview transcripts, says not one thing about that early police contention.
Can anyone find that earlier article?
Posted by b!X | October 20, 2006 8:43 AM
"I pulled my right foot back and kicked him in the upper chest," Nice said.
Kicked to death by Officer Nice. Life is so full of ironies it makes me want to laugh and cry. In the words of the immortal Joni Mitchell it's 'the same release'
Posted by tom | October 20, 2006 9:05 AM
"Oh, he's pissin'," Humphreys said to his partner. The officer made note that they were entering the revitalized Pearl District, a high-density area of restaurants and businesses.
*Sigh*
If he'd have done the same thing south of Burnside, he'd probably be alive today. I wonder if stomping mentally ill, homeless people to death is what the Supreme Court had in mind in Wardlow.
Posted by Chris Snethen | October 20, 2006 10:05 AM
I dunno, do you think getting stomped to death is more, or less, intrusive than a Terry stop?
Posted by Madam Hatter | October 20, 2006 11:53 AM
Yep. I was waiting for someone to point that out. The cops probably would have just laughed about it and drove on by if they saw a bum taking a leak on a bush over near East Burnside and MLK. The police don't even come out to investigate auto accidents and stolen bikes, etc., but if the $9 cocktail crowd at the Blue Hour might see a derelict watering a bush it turns into a death sentence. Of course none of this is a big surprise because we know where the priorities are in this town. It's all about the green baby...don't forget it.
Posted by Kevin | October 20, 2006 12:01 PM
Hey b!X - I remember that too, but not where. Nice's statement (pg 20) talks about the backpack briefly tho...
Posted by Madam Hatter | October 20, 2006 12:29 PM
Ah ha- I found it! It's the .pdf "fact sheet on the incident" the cops issued. Here's the address: (sorry, my links don't seem to work over here?)
http://www.portlandtribune.com/documents/chasse_fact_sheet.pdf
Posted by Madam Hatter | October 20, 2006 12:42 PM
Last year, I represented a young man in a Federal police misconduct case against the Portland Police. The claims in that case alleged that Officer Humphreys and three other Portland officers stood over a 19 year old man and beat him with a flashlight, a steel baton, boots, fists, pepper spray, and three tazer deployments. Officer Humphreys struck the young man across the shins and midsection with a steel baton about 30 times during the incident. I certainly would not object to someone calling Officer Humphreys "overzealous" in his use of force.
All the while the young man screamed for "help." Independent witnesses described the screams as horrific. Independent witnesses stated that the young man did not "resist" the officers and that the young man was simply trying to protect himself from the officer violence. By the way, it was a case of mistaken identity; the young man did not commit an underlying crime to lead to the officer melee.
In March 2006, the city took a sizable judgment against itself on the above case in return for dismissal against the individual officers. City Coucil reviewed the settlement before it was approved. For me, this settlement brings up two major points when though about in the context of the Chasse incident:
1. Prior to the Chasse incident, City Council was on notice that there were serious allegations of excessive force againt Officer Humphreys; AND
2.The City has already taken a bullet for Officer Humphries in the past, i.e. negotiated a deal that protected him from personal culpability for violent actions.
So now I have a couple of questions:
1. What does the City do when it takes a judgment against itself for its more "aggressivs" officers? After the judgment, did the City require that Humphreys be re-trained on the use of force or did they just send him back on his next shift?
2. How powerful is the Portland Police Union? Too Powerful?
One more thing: Portland Police are trained in many things. They are forced to take a number of mandatory classes, such as shooting guns, executing distraction strikes (i.e. how to make kicks and punches most effective), using steel batons, and using minor traffic violations as a pretext to stop young men who wear their pants too low. Every officer takes classes on the above subject matter. There are also a number of optional classes. Many officers do not take these classes. As of last I was aware, there is an OPTIONAL class on officer contact with mentally ill individuals, that trains the officer in how to appropriately manage interactions with folks who suffer from mental illness. I would bet my dollars against anyone's doughnuts that our Chasse Officers did not sign up for that class. With a certain lawusit to follow the Chasse incident, I wonder how much the City coffers will have to bleed, not to metnion mentally ill people brutalized, to make up for this lapse of judgment on the part of police officer training.
Posted by Travis Eiva | October 20, 2006 3:57 PM
A few points:
Bob has a great idea on police getting some basic medical training. That might help future interactions between cops and medics, let alone cops and suspects. As is, Portland cops get about zero medical training. They're CPR-certified but no cars have masks so Portland cops almost never perform CPR due to legitimate health fears.
Mr. Evia, there appears no underlying crime against Chasse either. His booking charges listed only post-Terry events. Well, I'm assuming the officers were using Terry since if they had PC they'd have listed it on the booking sheet given to jail. That's basic CYA for any resist or APSO charges.
From what I've observed, the City examines cops' excessive force situations on a case-by-case basis. Cops might be disciplined, they might not. It's a bit of a mystery, meaning it's ripe for arbitrary, capricious or friendly enforcement.
A big part of the problem here stems from the Portland Police Bureau lacking an employee review program. You read that correctly--no reviews. I've read that no other major city's police force does that. I think the City likes it that way because less employee performance documentation makes their pseudo-objective promotion "system" more likely to stand up in court.
Oh, and taking a "mandatory class [about] using minor traffic violations as a pretext to stop young men who wear their pants too low"? Well, I guess I missed that day because I never had it.
Posted by anahit | October 20, 2006 5:01 PM