
We accept advertising through Blogads. If you're interested, click the "Advertise here" link above, or go here to place your ad through Blogads. For assistance, e-mail me here; I'd be glad to help. Reach lots of viewers -- we're up to about 3,800 unique visits a day, and more than 61,000 page views a week (as of November 4). Our rates are dirt cheap for the exposure you'll get!
As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
Cameron, Chardonnay
B.R. Cohn, Cabernet, Silver Label 2006
Graffigna, Cabernet 2005
Palo Alto, Reserve Red 2008
Menguante, Garnacha 2008
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Felsina Berardenga, Vin Santo 1997
Anne Amie, Pinot Gris 2009
McKinley Springs, Bombing Ramge Red 2007
Vieux Papes Red
Dionysius Chardonnay 2009
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2009
Vega Montan, Mencia 2008
Chateau la Vernede, Coteaux du Languedoc 2007
Mount Defiance, Hellfire (White) 2008
Root: 1, Cabernet 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Pinot Grigio 2009
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 White, 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 Rose, 2007
Abacela, Grenache Rose 2009
Avia Cabernet 2004
Lemelson Pinot Noir, Thea's Selection 2007
Chateau de la Roulerie, Rose d'Anjou 2009
Casal Garcia, Vinho Verde Rose
La Ferme Julien, Rose 2008
Cana's Feast, Bricco Red, 2006
Hogue, Genesis Merlot, 2008
Owen Roe, Sharecropper's Cabernet, 2008
Kim Crawford, Unoaked Chardonnay 2008
J. Scott, Pinot Noir 2008
Edmunds St. John, White, Heart of Gold 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2006
Stevenot, Cabernet, Sierra Foothills, "Stanford" 2000
Portuga, Vinho Rose 2009
Taylor Fladgate, First Estate Reserve Porto
Franciscan, Cabernet, Napa 2006
Chaparral de Vega Sindoa, Garnacha 2008
Quinta da Aveleda, Vinho Verde 2008
St. Francis, Chardonnay Sonoma 2008
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone Blanc, 2007
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Noir 2008
St. Innocent, Pinot Noir 2006
Jigsaw, Pinot Noir 2007
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Indian Wells 2007
Charles Shaw, Chardonnay 2008
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Rosé 2009
Cameron, Willamette Valley Chardonnay
Il Valore, Sangiovese, Giovane, Puglia 2008
Duck Pond, Chardonnay, Wahluke Slope 2007
Kim Crawford, Marlborough Pinot Noir 2008
Domaine du Pesquier, Cotes du Rhone 2005
Cantina Zaccagnini, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo 2006
Domaine Matrot, Chardonnay, Bourgogne 2007
David Hill, Oregon Sparkling Wine, Brut
Chandler Reach, Monte Regalo 2006
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2008
Kirkland, Columbia Valley Merlot 2008
D'Aragon, Old Vine Garnacha 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2005
Pavin & Riley, Merlot 2006
David Hill, Estate Pinot Noir, Barrel Select 2006
Castle Rock, Paso Robles Cabernet 2006
Magnificent, Cabernet, Steak House 2008
Conundrum 2008
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Saint Cosme, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
La Granja, Tempranillo 360, 2008
Santa Rita, Mendalla Real Cabernet 2006
Columbia Crest, Grand Estates Merlot 2006
Andezon, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
Collegiata, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo
Troon, Druid's Fluid 2008
La Granja, Tempranillo 2008
Monte Antico, Toscana 2006
Vieux Papes, Blanc de Blancs
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Miles run year to date: 26
At this date last year: 15
Total run in 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (28)
I dunno, that sounds more like something our governor would say...
Posted by Jon | January 22, 2007 12:57 PM
Pay up, Karl.
Posted by Chris Snethen | January 22, 2007 1:33 PM
Sadly, Hillary proposed the same thing back in that brief co-Presidency period.
Posted by Jack Bog | January 22, 2007 1:39 PM
Prediction: this will probably last along as his big plan for the trip to Mars.
Posted by Dave J. | January 22, 2007 1:59 PM
On the subject of Mars, look for a Kennedy-isq announcement to build a permanent moon-base by 2024.
Posted by Thomas Ware | January 22, 2007 2:05 PM
Judging by how well our public schools perform, nationalizing health care is definitely not a good idea.
As if Medicare/Medicaid isn't bloated enough already.
Posted by Chris McMullen | January 22, 2007 2:13 PM
...look for a Kennedy-esque announcement to build a permanent moon-base by 2024.
Tom Friedman is right. Energy independence is this generation's moon shot. We've been to the moon. It's time to shoot for something new. Unfortunately this president is incapable of doing that.
How about affordable hydrogen fueled cars in every garage by 2017?
Posted by Chris Snethen | January 22, 2007 2:45 PM
"As if Medicare/Medicaid isn't bloated enough already."
You might want to look at some objective facts about this -- for example, the administrative cost of Medicare compared to the administrative cost of private, insurance-based health care. Then, on the other hand, they might not support your bias, so maybe it's best not to look.
Posted by Allan L. | January 22, 2007 2:59 PM
How about affordable hydrogen fueled cars in every garage by 2017?
Doesnt that produce water vapor? I thought water vapor was the biggest contributor to the greenhouse effect?
How does that help?
Posted by Jon | January 22, 2007 3:16 PM
That last line should be "How does that help global warming?"
I know it helps energy independence.
(Except for all the plastics we make, and heating oil.)
Posted by Jon | January 22, 2007 3:19 PM
"Judging by how well our public schools perform, nationalizing health care is definitely not a good idea."
Silly me. I had no idea our schools were run by the federal government. That explains almost everything.
Posted by Allan L. | January 22, 2007 4:42 PM
Just keep defending the status quo Allan. So good to see your partisanship clouding your logic. Boy, the OHP and Oregon public schools are really thriving, aren't they?
BTW, Medicare/Medicaid many 'administrative' costs are left out of all those 'objective' reports you're referring to. Add in things like debt servicing and management costs, Medicare meets or exceeds private admin costs.
Posted by Chris McMullen | January 22, 2007 4:52 PM
S/B: "many of Medicare/Medicaid's…"
Posted by Chris McMullen | January 22, 2007 4:54 PM
The State of Oregon already imposes a hidden tax on health insurance to pay for the Oregon Health Plan. Oregon charges each insurance company about $180 per year per employee covered. The insurance company passes the cost back to the company, which may pass some of it back to the employee. So, our state is a little ahead of Bush.
Posted by joel | January 22, 2007 5:41 PM
It's not like Junior has ever cared about finding the money to pay for his programs before. Why start now?
Posted by Shelley | January 22, 2007 6:15 PM
Chris, I can't tell whether you are defending the current state of health care in the U.S. or avocating against public education. Either one, I would think, is a steep hill to climb.
I would be interested in seeing sources for your assertion that Medicare administrative costs exceed those in the private sector. I think that's demonstrably wrong. Studies that I have seen that try to defend private sector costs mostly show that, while private sector costs may not be ten times Medicare's, they are certainly four or five times as high, even after a lot of massaging. Capital costs are not administrative costs in either public or private financial reporting, but to my knowlege there are no capital costs yet in Medicare (though the drug "benefit" will probably change that).
I don't think it is necessary to defend public education in order to argue for a better health care system. But I would strongly defend it in principle, even though I would agree with you that it is not in a good state here in Oregon (or very many other places in this country). There are a lot of reasons for that, and inadequate funding is among them. Inadequate funding, by the way, is the main reason the Oregon Health Plan is no longer achieving its objectives. Meanwhile, we are all paying (some of us only indirectly) far too much for far too little in health care.
Posted by Allan L. | January 22, 2007 7:18 PM
"advocating" against public education
Posted by Allan L. | January 22, 2007 8:46 PM
How does that help?
Well it gets us thinking. And moving toward a solution. I don't think we can afford to spend another decade talking about how new ideas won't work. I'm merely suggesting we spend the next 10 years thinking of ideas that will get us toward energy independence and putting those ideas to work. It's not just about the environment. It's about jobs. It's about trade. It's about education. It's about a lot of things. There's a tremendous opportunity here, but if we sit on our hands and complain that it's too tough and allow our leaders to continue business as usual, this opportunity will be lost for another generation.
Posted by Chris Snethen | January 22, 2007 8:54 PM
I'm not sure what the objection to this proposal is, as it only taxes benefits under those "gold-plated" plans that offer health insurance valued at more than $15,000 a year. It is those people who have very generous health benefits who can afford to go running to the doctor for every sneeze and sniffle, without thinking about the cost, that drive up the cost of medicine. If no one is concerned about the cost (because, after all, their insurance will pay in full, with a $5 co-payment) then people overconsume the resource -- and that's just basic economics.
I think this proposal to offer families a tax deduction for their health insurance up to a value of $15,000 (regardless of who provides the benefit, self or employer) and individuals deductions of $7,500 would make health care more affordable to more people. And that's a good thing. Finally Bush is getting SOMETHING right, even if it is late in his presidency.
Now if we could just get him to understand basic Constitutional precepts, we'd really be getting somewhere!
Posted by al | January 23, 2007 6:54 AM
It is those people who have very generous health benefits who can afford to go running to the doctor for every sneeze and sniffle, without thinking about the cost, that drive up the cost of medicine.
That has a nice ring to it, but there are very few people in this category.
Posted by Jack Bog | January 23, 2007 7:15 AM
Finally Bush is getting SOMETHING right, even if it is late in his presidency.
Amen. Isnt this what people want? Its essentially government subsidized health care...just that the "care" is kept in the private sector, where it belongs.
Although I doubt teachers here will be happy with it. Their benefits package is in the $25k ballpark (according to a Trib article a while back). I would bet most of that is their health coverage. Anyone want to bet they bitch up a storm? Or will the state offer the Teachers Union something similar?
Posted by Jon | January 23, 2007 7:58 AM
Although I doubt teachers here will be happy with it.
Bingo. This thing is a dead letter and the president knows it. But it plays right into the right wing talking points.
Unions bad!
Teachers are overpaid!
Public education sucks!
He doesn't want to talk about healthcare at all. And the media is eating it up (again). Every story you hear about this proposal reminds us unions have these gold-plated plans GWB wants to tax. Just when I thought the president was the dumbest guy in the room.
Posted by Chris Snethen | January 23, 2007 8:30 AM
It's all the unions' fault. It has nothing to do with filthy rich doctors, ripoff hospital corporations, or crooked pharamaceutical companies.
Posted by Jack Bog | January 23, 2007 9:08 AM
Even discussing a domestioc proposal Bush will make in the SOU is a waste of time. Haven't you caught on yet? To him these are just speeches, they don't actually mean anything. Look back at the previous ones, he always make a bunch of proposals which are promptly filed, seen any switch-grass farms?
Posted by Eric | January 23, 2007 9:11 AM
seen any switch-grass farms?
Ask Gregg Clapper.
Posted by Chris Snethen | January 23, 2007 9:19 AM
It's all the unions' fault. It has nothing to do with filthy rich doctors, ripoff hospital corporations, or crooked pharamaceutical companies.
Actually, I think it has a lot more to do with the crooked, filthy rich health insurance companies...Im not the type that goes to the doctor "for every little sniffle", but I sure get tired of the damn insurance company arguing about every single nickel they are billed for. Especially with the amount of money they get from all of us every month.
Just last week I finished an argument with my insurance company from a single $130 office visit in April of last year! It was for my daughter, and it was the ONLY time all year she went to the doctor. They get several hundred of my hard earned dollars a month, and they bitched about $130. Now yes, I could afford to just pay for it. But its the principle. I pay them to cover my family. (I did win though.)
Its just stupid. I mean c'mon, my family is fairly healthy. Out of 5 people...we went to the doctor a total of 3 times all year. Total with prescriptions about $500. Yet they got about $12,000 of my money in premiums. Year before that, maybe 5 office visits for flu & such, and I broke my ankle. Emergency room, and maybe 6 office visits. Total about $7,500.
Its one helluva racket.
Posted by Jon | January 23, 2007 10:17 AM
I'll bet GOP guru Gregg Clapper's entire marijuana crop that W doesn't talk about Iraq for more than two sentences... one of them linking it to 9/11.
Then, I'll wash down W's garish garbage with some Vicodan and call it a night, like the Bush Twins do most evenings.
Posted by Daphne | January 23, 2007 10:19 AM
The health care problems in this country are intractable, but I guess it's good that politicians on both sides are trying to do something.
Regarding the people with "gold-plated" health plans, Julie Rovner on NPR said this morning that about 20% of people with insurance would fall into this category. The Administration seems pretty open that the intent of this is to limit the number of high-end plans as a strategy for controlling costs system-wide. Intellectually, this idea makes some sense and is consistent with Bush's view that the tax system is the appropriate place to influence individual behavior, rather than through a government program. (Personally I think the tax code IS a government program, but whatever.) Bush has been proposing health care tax credits and deductions for years, this is just a newly expanded program.
That said, of course this is also political because it goes after mostly union workers and avoids directly taking on the health care industry. And Bush knows it has no chance in Congress, but he can claim to be doing something.
Finally, Jon, the reason the insurance company makes money off of you is because they are providing insurance. You pay too much because some other poor soul was nailed by a bus and is still racking up $100k hospital bills.
Posted by Miles | January 23, 2007 12:47 PM