
We accept advertising through Blogads. If you're interested, click the "Advertise here" link above, or go here to place your ad through Blogads. For assistance, e-mail me here; I'd be glad to help. Reach lots of viewers -- we're up to about 3,800 unique visits a day, and more than 61,000 page views a week (as of November 4). Our rates are dirt cheap for the exposure you'll get!
As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
Cameron, Chardonnay
B.R. Cohn, Cabernet, Silver Label 2006
Graffigna, Cabernet 2005
Palo Alto, Reserve Red 2008
Menguante, Garnacha 2008
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Felsina Berardenga, Vin Santo 1997
Anne Amie, Pinot Gris 2009
McKinley Springs, Bombing Ramge Red 2007
Vieux Papes Red
Dionysius Chardonnay 2009
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2009
Vega Montan, Mencia 2008
Chateau la Vernede, Coteaux du Languedoc 2007
Mount Defiance, Hellfire (White) 2008
Root: 1, Cabernet 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Pinot Grigio 2009
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 White, 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 Rose, 2007
Abacela, Grenache Rose 2009
Avia Cabernet 2004
Lemelson Pinot Noir, Thea's Selection 2007
Chateau de la Roulerie, Rose d'Anjou 2009
Casal Garcia, Vinho Verde Rose
La Ferme Julien, Rose 2008
Cana's Feast, Bricco Red, 2006
Hogue, Genesis Merlot, 2008
Owen Roe, Sharecropper's Cabernet, 2008
Kim Crawford, Unoaked Chardonnay 2008
J. Scott, Pinot Noir 2008
Edmunds St. John, White, Heart of Gold 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2006
Stevenot, Cabernet, Sierra Foothills, "Stanford" 2000
Portuga, Vinho Rose 2009
Taylor Fladgate, First Estate Reserve Porto
Franciscan, Cabernet, Napa 2006
Chaparral de Vega Sindoa, Garnacha 2008
Quinta da Aveleda, Vinho Verde 2008
St. Francis, Chardonnay Sonoma 2008
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone Blanc, 2007
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Noir 2008
St. Innocent, Pinot Noir 2006
Jigsaw, Pinot Noir 2007
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Indian Wells 2007
Charles Shaw, Chardonnay 2008
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Rosé 2009
Cameron, Willamette Valley Chardonnay
Il Valore, Sangiovese, Giovane, Puglia 2008
Duck Pond, Chardonnay, Wahluke Slope 2007
Kim Crawford, Marlborough Pinot Noir 2008
Domaine du Pesquier, Cotes du Rhone 2005
Cantina Zaccagnini, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo 2006
Domaine Matrot, Chardonnay, Bourgogne 2007
David Hill, Oregon Sparkling Wine, Brut
Chandler Reach, Monte Regalo 2006
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2008
Kirkland, Columbia Valley Merlot 2008
D'Aragon, Old Vine Garnacha 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2005
Pavin & Riley, Merlot 2006
David Hill, Estate Pinot Noir, Barrel Select 2006
Castle Rock, Paso Robles Cabernet 2006
Magnificent, Cabernet, Steak House 2008
Conundrum 2008
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Saint Cosme, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
La Granja, Tempranillo 360, 2008
Santa Rita, Mendalla Real Cabernet 2006
Columbia Crest, Grand Estates Merlot 2006
Andezon, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
Collegiata, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo
Troon, Druid's Fluid 2008
La Granja, Tempranillo 2008
Monte Antico, Toscana 2006
Vieux Papes, Blanc de Blancs
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Miles run year to date: 26
At this date last year: 15
Total run in 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (37)
Take it or leave it? Where's the leave-it option?
Posted by Allan L. | July 10, 2009 7:00 AM
This is why I am no longer a member of the Democratic Party. These guys bitch long and hard about corporations, but then they turn around and do things like this. Welfare for the well to do.
So long Portland. It's been a lesson in double speak.
Posted by Libertarian Guy | July 10, 2009 7:32 AM
In the words of Miss Daisy, "I may sick up". URRRP!
Posted by portland native | July 10, 2009 8:13 AM
Oh yeah, and Ball Janick gets another $100 grand a year to boot!
Posted by portland native | July 10, 2009 8:15 AM
I find when my blood pressure starts going up, that it helps to view these people as legendary comedians.
The obvious choice for Sam, Randy, and Merritt would be the 3 Stooges, but they're just not charming enough. I could envision these 3 as captains of industry who hire the 3 Stooges to redo PGE Park.
But the moment recently that came closest to comedy legend involves Merritt as Inspector Clouseau:
Imagine the average citizen of Portland as the twitching Chief Inspector Dreyfus. He's followed the national scene and watched his beloved country get taken to the brink by financial shenanigans. Not only does nobody go to jail, but hundreds of billions of dollars are then given to the very people who screwed everything up.
He reads that one of the main culprits - Henry Paulson - is now one of the owners of the local baseball and soccer teams. The twitching and weird giggling starts: "Here? Here in Portland? Not enough they ruin the country - they have to come right here?"
Then he watches as the son Merritt Clouseau spends months bouncing around Portland causing one bumbling foul-up after another. Rose Quarter, Lents.
Finally Dreyfus has a chance to interview this man - this representation of the economic collapse of the United States - who even now is using institutions we just bailed out to continue his ridiculous schemes.
The Chief Inspector fights to remain calm, asking reasonable questions about the deal. Then Merritt Clouseau utters these words:
"I need a facility that works, but I need to recognize the times that we're in."
The Chief Inspector starts twitching and rises up: "Recognize the times we're in? Your family CAUSED the times we're in, you idiot! You want to recognize the times we're in, look across the dinner table at Thanksgiving!"
The Chief Inspector is led away in a straitjacket. Fade to black.
Posted by Bill McDonald | July 10, 2009 8:47 AM
How long is it going to take before the progressive voters in Portland wise up and vote these people out? Recalling Adams is a real good start.
Posted by John Benton | July 10, 2009 8:51 AM
Never, Mr. Benton, never.
Posted by Garage Wine | July 10, 2009 9:22 AM
Except this is not a 3 Stooges/Pink Panther flick and these not so funny clowns are playing with our hard earned tax dollars!
The whole deal makes me sick and I am really mad that these mealy mouthed hoodlums are in charge. It is really upsetting that they are now perceived as so all powerful that no one will stand up and say, "enough!".
I understand that for some ordinary citizen to stand up to these creeps, those who oppose 'Paulson Inc.' would probably loose any and every thing they had worked for a life time to accumulate.
It is difficult decision to decide to risk everything one has worked for to loose it to the criminals who are now running our city.
Posted by portland native | July 10, 2009 10:00 AM
I am angry that a carpetbagger like Paulson can come into Portland and basically gain control of our stadium so easily. I love both the Timbers and Beavers and love PGE Park how it is. Why aren't our elected officials standing up for the good of the public? It's so very sad.
Posted by Soul | July 10, 2009 10:25 AM
This is a great deal for the city of Portland. Paulson needs the deal to be set in stone so that he can go ahead and build up interest in the team. 5,000 season ticket deposits have already been collected in phase 1.
Please take a look at home well soccer is performing in Seattle... most people are saying its a better value and more exciting than their NFL season tickets. Not to mention they have sold more season tickets than the Mariners by a few thousand. If soccer can take the number spot in Seattle then imagine how successful it can be here in Portland only having competition from the Blazers for a few months each year. We need a top level summer sport!
The drop of funding from 38 down to 31 million will likely cut out the expensive restaurant plan he had for the existing seating above the North End.
Posted by Michael Fogg | July 10, 2009 10:39 AM
"I am angry that a carpetbagger like Paulson can come into Portland " but just maybe that carpetbag contains enough shekels to take care of the Motley crew and the media that aids support.
Another example of Democracy, the experiment that has failed.
Posted by KISS | July 10, 2009 10:45 AM
Michael Fogg,
Does it bother you that the man who walked out with George W and Bernanke into the Rose Garden, and asked for 700 billion dollars to bailout his friends, is now minority-owner of the Beavers and Timbers and asking for help from taxpayers here? I mean, when does it end with these people? Do they ever do anything without asking for help? They're RICH. Poor people don't ask for this much help.
Two things can happen: It will be a wild success and the Paulsons will get a tremendous return with the value of the team.
It will fail in which case we've lost a baseball stadium and God knows what else.
The more I think about this, the more I see it as the story of what went wrong with America. Right now this country is a place where ordinary people watch and pay as the bigshots act out their schemes.
There was a time when the titans of industry weren't the real story. They were there, but it wasn't about them. I don't think John Wayne ever played a Wall Street tycoon. America was about rugged individuals starting out with a dream.
When we lost that and started genuflecting to these Wall Street sleazeballs is when we started losing this country, maybe forever.
P.S. Did you see the AIG bonus story this morning? Not the old one - the new one. That's the same firm Henry Paulson gave the bailout money to with a huge chunk going back to Goldman Sachs to help pay for the screw-ups of....Henry Paulson.
And now he's a co-owner of the Portland Timbers and he wants YOU to help him grow his investment. Incredible.
Posted by Bill McDonald | July 10, 2009 10:58 AM
If there two kinds of seafood I hate most, it's got to be red herring and flounder.
Posted by John Boy | July 10, 2009 11:22 AM
There seem to be 2 sharply divided camps on this whole MLS stadium issue.
The types who look at the numbers, the sketchy details, the funding sources and say "this is an insanely bad deal for the people of portland"
The types who arent "numbers people" who just want soccer and figure that it will all work out in the end.
I just dont think there is any way someone can look at the numbers and say this is a going to work out for anyone but Paulson, whether you like soccer or not. It just doesnt add up.
Posted by mk | July 10, 2009 11:34 AM
"Please take a look at home well soccer is performing in Seattle"
Please take a look at how well MLS is doing in 11 out fo 14 other places, viz, losing money and poor attendance.
Posted by Steve | July 10, 2009 11:35 AM
"The drop of funding from 38 down to 31 million will likely cut out the expensive restaurant plan"
What will happen is we'll get about $2M into this thing and then the following conversation will happen:
Paulson: Can't finish the project, we need another $15M, Garber says so
Randy: Well, I'm going to take my pickup truck and tear down PGE Park.
Paulson: Well, we stop and MLS is dead (echoes of 200 Timbers fans waving poor taste scarfs a la something they saw on BBC)
Randy: Erm, OK what do want?
Posted by Steve | July 10, 2009 11:39 AM
"Please take a look at how well MLS is doing in 11 out fo 14 other places, viz, losing money and poor attendance."
Please compare apples to apples and take a look at how well the last 2 expansion franchises are perfoming.
Posted by David | July 10, 2009 11:42 AM
Our market when it comes to soccer is vastly superior to other MLS cities like Dallas and Columbus.
Don Garber and MLS changed their policy on expansion a while back and it has been extremely successful. They aren't simply awarding teams to any city that has the money. They are looking at the fan base and the potential for growth. Toronto and Seattle are the last two expansion cities and they are both phenomenal success stories. This is the future of MLS and the rise of Portland and Vancouver will only continue this trend.
This league will not fold and they are very intelligent when it comes to salary cap. Did you realize that that cap is around 2.6 million for an entire team??? MLS teams don't need to be selling 20,000 tickets a night to be successful, but Portland and Vancouver will join Seattle, Toronto, and the Galaxy in the 20k ticket club.
Posted by mike | July 10, 2009 12:36 PM
I can understand most of your feelings towards the Paulson Family. Would you still be completely opposed to MLS if it was a different man asking for help???
The city is getting a great deal. Where else have you seen a professional sports franchise cost less than 23 million to obtain?
Portland deserves a second major league team, and the chances of ever getting NFL or MLB are slim to none. Not to mention the cost of getting one of those teams and building them a stadium which would be hundreds of millions of dollars. MLS is the perfect league for our market and it will compliment the Trail Blazers nicely.
Posted by mike | July 10, 2009 12:43 PM
The city is not getting the franchise; Paulson is. If it's sold at a profit, the city gets nothing from that.
MLS is a disease. It is not a "major league" by any honest definition of that term. It's probably not in the top 10 soccer leagues in the world.
The city is going to put up money that it doesn't have to remodel a stadium on which it still owes $26 million for the last remodel. It will collect rent for only a few years, and then the private company will get to use the place for free for nearly two decades.
The city isn't "getting" much of anything here. And it's losing minor league baseball forever.
Some folks hate this deal because it enriches the Paulson family, whom they understandably consider the scum of the earth. I wouldn't care if the owner were the Pope, Al Gore, or Dave Letterman -- the deal itself stinks to high heaven.
Posted by Jack Bog | July 10, 2009 12:50 PM
Amen, Jack!
Posted by portland native | July 10, 2009 1:04 PM
Of course a league that has been around for only about 12 years will not challenge the European powers. The English Premier, Spanish La Liga, and the German Bundesliga are still leagues beyond MLS but they are also spending upwards of 200 million on their rosters. Compared to 2.6 million its no surprise why they are able to lure talent. What you need to understand is that players want to come to America to play. They want to leave the football spotlight of Europe to come to a league that is both competitive and enjoyable. The main barrier at this point is being able to pay these players the money they can make elsewhere. The cap will continue to rise and this will start happening.
In another 12 years I think MLS will easily be in the top ten.
Posted by mike | July 10, 2009 1:10 PM
The LA Galaxy paid Beckham a zillion dollars to play in the US and it was an unmitigated disaster.
Posted by junior | July 10, 2009 1:15 PM
In another 12 years I think MLS will easily be in the top ten.
More likely, in Chapter 7.
Posted by Jack Bog | July 10, 2009 1:19 PM
Yeah, other Mike ...
So when all these Euro players come over here demanding big bucks and the teams raise caps to pay the star players, and then face budget shortages because now their annual expenses go up, don't you see that either
(1) ticket prices will go up, thus defeating the populist idea that "all citizens of Portland will have a chance to see some great new sport" or
(2) Paulson will go back to the City and demand forgiveness on the terms or an extension because, darn it, these payroll costs are just killing my profit margins!
Posted by Mike (the other one) | July 10, 2009 1:24 PM
"It is not a 'major league' by any honest definition of that term."
I agree. I say we hold out for an EPL expansion team.
Posted by Ben | July 10, 2009 1:28 PM
And what was the part about Ball/Janik getting a couple hundred grand per year to advise the city? Doesn't the city already employ it's own attornies for heaven's sake? Why the outsourcing?
Posted by RANZ | July 10, 2009 1:57 PM
Q: "Why the outsourcing?"
A: "That's just the way things are done around here. Sit down, shut up and stop asking so many annoying questions."
Posted by Usual Kevin | July 10, 2009 2:47 PM
What a deal. Taxpayers get a stadium that they are paying around $100 million for with finance charges, which will produce no revenue for the next 25 years.
Does Paulson even pay the bill for lights, water and upkeep, or was that thrown out with his offer to pay a part of the construction costs?
Posted by JerryB | July 10, 2009 4:52 PM
$7 mil. Apparantly that's Sam's price. Pays off loans credit cards $1m to friends ..the whole shebang. you net about $3 mil, put that in a CD and you can go below radar quite easily ... forever.
Posted by got logic? | July 10, 2009 5:19 PM
Some of the comments seem(ed) to be like 'paid shills' sort of 'on a mission' spiking the conversation with 'Paulsen justifications' maybe the word for a categorization of it could be a 'pro-troll.' (As opposed to ordinary trolls with comments to disparage and disrupt.)
Troll: "You're all being unreasonable."
Pro-troll: "Come, let us reason together."
- -
B.McD.'s comments spoke for me. For all the world it looks like there is some subsurface reason -- pick one: [ ] blackmail, [ ] extortion, [ ] coercion, [ ] quid pro quo, [ ] personal enrichment, [ ] all of the above, [ ] eat squid go hurl -- why the obvious foolishness of 'the deal,' and 3-card-monte machinations, is NOT the considerations the councillor(d)s vote by.
I reject out-of-hand the idea that key Council votes are motivated by either perverse powerlust or direct dollar greed. Yeah, someone could be enjoying the wield of decision and the self-importance feeling of it, and fawning to it, and yeah, someone could be making a million getting paid for their vote. Yet I just don't think either of those is the primary motive. Carrots can't attract as strongly as sticks can goad -- it is NOT what they are going to get if they vote for it, but rather, it is what is going to happen to them if they do NOT avoid voting against it.
No pie-in-the-sky upside future of Major League Soccer, (which looks stupid simply seeing the words), lifts the 'aye'-voting hand as much as such threats as 'knowing where you live' or 'holding your kid hostage.' (And I like soccer, playing it mainly but also watching it, much more than most folks I know.)
Some thing some where some how is too fishy about all this.
- -
One comment explains the social suicide of standing up and speaking up alone against the ogres of oligopoly. That's why mob action was invented. But convening as a group, standing up and speaking out, in this town these days gets you'all gunned down and murdered dead by Police Homeland Security SWAT robocops. There's a long list of assassinations blood in the dirt we're standing on, from before JFK to after Wellstone ... and besides, what's on TV tonite? change the channel, everyone's too busy, 'snot my job.
This politics-by-deathgrip-visegrip, by fear instead of hope, is the hate and heat that doesn't stop and boils the water in the pond we frogs are croaking in. At the City level, and the State level, and the Federal level -- see it up and down the line, whatever scope of things you choose to survey. But action taken has to chop the head off of the beast, which means, essentially, end the federal corruption. which happens to date from about 1945, on. which happens to coincide with the advent of the television's brainwashing influence. which effectively means abolish the CIA. I mean, in real simplistic terms and sequence; if you can get real about it.
The simplest evidence is Eisenhower's report: The military-industrial complex'll getcha. You could kind of figure if he was on the inside, he maybe knew a thing or two.
Little Lord Paulsen can come in this town, turn it upside down and shake it down and keep the money and walk away rich and un-arrested because he's got 'fed.cred.' and federal eavesdropping can nip in the bud any movement forming up to stop him.
Remember, the guy who 'invented' the CIA, (i.e., Allen Dulles, to be simplistic about it, again), started out as a P.R. man, obsessed (careerwise) with influence that can control what people think, studied at the knee of Edward Bernays -- Mister P.R. (look it up).
That's where the pro-troll tactic comes in. (I see it appearing more and more on topical politics blogs, where I've followed discussions and so on for many years. btw, Congrats Jack, on your Seven Year Hitch here.)
And PAULSON: GET THE PUKE OUT of Portland. And STAY OUT !!
Posted by Tenskwatawa | July 10, 2009 7:12 PM
'bambooger'
not scary 'Therey'
SHUT UP. Go away. You're stupid. You're toast. Raygun's dead and so's the GOP and fascist racist rightwing ridiculousness. See the casket: Get under it.
Posted by Tenskwatawa | July 10, 2009 7:20 PM
When the (disasterous) Portland Breakers moved into Civic Stadium in 1985, does anyone know how much the city was on the hook for stadium improvements? Considering the Breakers had an average draw of 19,000 and change per game (according to Wikipedia), I'm thinking that the cost per butt in seat for the Breakers was far less than what's being proposed for the Timbers.
Posted by Aaron | July 10, 2009 7:33 PM
Jack and I might be looking at this from 2 different angles but in a way it's the same. He writes, "I wouldn't care if the owner were the Pope, Al Gore, or Dave Letterman -- the deal itself stinks to high heaven."
See, I don't believe David Letterman or those others would be involved in a deal like this. The reason the deal stinks to high heaven is because we are dealing with people who routinely run these kinds of deals. They live for this stuff. It is who they are. They are the vampires, we have the blood.
Hints usually come as small subtle things, but there was nothing subtle about TARP or the economic crisis currently threatening to ruin America. We were given the Mother of All Hints that doing business with the Paulsons is a dangerous thing. And our people still didn't get it - or worse yet, they are so corrupt they don't want to get it.
By the way, the co-owner of the Timbers will be testifying in Congress July 16th about some shady aspect of the bailout involving Bank of America. It'll be a good chance to see for yourself what kind of person this is.
My point is that we had all the clues in the world here, and our city council proceeded to let these people screw us over anyway.
What they have done with PGE Park sounds more like a country ceding over the sovereignty of a piece of land to someone else. It is now the public's only in the sense that we are still responsible financially. As far as owning it? That's basically over.
Not unlike how Wall Street bought the government of America.
Posted by Bill McDonald | July 10, 2009 7:58 PM
Did you hear the one about what corporate welfare looks like? Well, kiddies.. this is a good example.... on to the next boondoggle.
Posted by LucsAdvo | July 10, 2009 9:36 PM
Tenskwatawa,
Re: your link to “A Timeline of CIA Atrocities”.
Kangas labels the U.S. intelligence community’s early(1945-8) partnership with the Gehlen Org “Operation Paperclip”. He has Operation Paperclip confused with Operation Rusty.
Read about Operation Rusty here:
http://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/wwii/articles/operationrusty.aspx
Be sure to check out the footnotes and bibliography at the end of this article. Here you will find a link to George Washington University’s page of declassified CIA documents which detail the Army and CIA’s early involvement with Gehlen-Operation Rusty(including a statement-Document 7-by ace columnist Steve Duin’s late uncle.
*There's a brief CIA authored biography of him on page xxxvi in the “Volumne 1: Introduction” link on the same page.
Posted by Geoff | July 11, 2009 8:29 AM
The bottom line is, if Paulson truly thinks the soccer team's going to be a great financial success, there's no reason for him to rely on public funds for such a large portion of the startup costs. He's essentially shielding himself from risks, shoving them off onto the Portland and Oregon taxpayers. It's a win-win situation for him, not so much for the rest of us.
Posted by darrelplant | July 11, 2009 12:09 PM