
We accept advertising through Blogads. If you're interested, click the "Advertise here" link above, or go here to place your ad through Blogads. For assistance, e-mail me here; I'd be glad to help. Reach lots of viewers -- we're up to about 3,800 unique visits a day, and more than 61,000 page views a week (as of November 4). Our rates are dirt cheap for the exposure you'll get!
As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
Cameron, Chardonnay
B.R. Cohn, Cabernet, Silver Label 2006
Graffigna, Cabernet 2005
Palo Alto, Reserve Red 2008
Menguante, Garnacha 2008
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Felsina Berardenga, Vin Santo 1997
Anne Amie, Pinot Gris 2009
McKinley Springs, Bombing Ramge Red 2007
Vieux Papes Red
Dionysius Chardonnay 2009
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2009
Vega Montan, Mencia 2008
Chateau la Vernede, Coteaux du Languedoc 2007
Mount Defiance, Hellfire (White) 2008
Root: 1, Cabernet 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Pinot Grigio 2009
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 White, 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 Rose, 2007
Abacela, Grenache Rose 2009
Avia Cabernet 2004
Lemelson Pinot Noir, Thea's Selection 2007
Chateau de la Roulerie, Rose d'Anjou 2009
Casal Garcia, Vinho Verde Rose
La Ferme Julien, Rose 2008
Cana's Feast, Bricco Red, 2006
Hogue, Genesis Merlot, 2008
Owen Roe, Sharecropper's Cabernet, 2008
Kim Crawford, Unoaked Chardonnay 2008
J. Scott, Pinot Noir 2008
Edmunds St. John, White, Heart of Gold 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2006
Stevenot, Cabernet, Sierra Foothills, "Stanford" 2000
Portuga, Vinho Rose 2009
Taylor Fladgate, First Estate Reserve Porto
Franciscan, Cabernet, Napa 2006
Chaparral de Vega Sindoa, Garnacha 2008
Quinta da Aveleda, Vinho Verde 2008
St. Francis, Chardonnay Sonoma 2008
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone Blanc, 2007
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Noir 2008
St. Innocent, Pinot Noir 2006
Jigsaw, Pinot Noir 2007
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Indian Wells 2007
Charles Shaw, Chardonnay 2008
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Rosé 2009
Cameron, Willamette Valley Chardonnay
Il Valore, Sangiovese, Giovane, Puglia 2008
Duck Pond, Chardonnay, Wahluke Slope 2007
Kim Crawford, Marlborough Pinot Noir 2008
Domaine du Pesquier, Cotes du Rhone 2005
Cantina Zaccagnini, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo 2006
Domaine Matrot, Chardonnay, Bourgogne 2007
David Hill, Oregon Sparkling Wine, Brut
Chandler Reach, Monte Regalo 2006
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2008
Kirkland, Columbia Valley Merlot 2008
D'Aragon, Old Vine Garnacha 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2005
Pavin & Riley, Merlot 2006
David Hill, Estate Pinot Noir, Barrel Select 2006
Castle Rock, Paso Robles Cabernet 2006
Magnificent, Cabernet, Steak House 2008
Conundrum 2008
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Saint Cosme, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
La Granja, Tempranillo 360, 2008
Santa Rita, Mendalla Real Cabernet 2006
Columbia Crest, Grand Estates Merlot 2006
Andezon, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
Collegiata, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo
Troon, Druid's Fluid 2008
La Granja, Tempranillo 2008
Monte Antico, Toscana 2006
Vieux Papes, Blanc de Blancs
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Miles run year to date: 26
At this date last year: 15
Total run in 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (30)
Portland's new motto: "The City That's Topsy-Turvy!"
Posted by Mojo | July 16, 2010 7:48 AM
Go by carousel horse!
Posted by Mojo | July 16, 2010 7:49 AM
Yeah sure let's bailout every core function neglected by sorry politicians.
Hey why not have another property tax boost to pay off TriMet's $700 million unfunded fringe benefits that is off books and getting not a dime form their budgets. It's only grwon to $50 million per year deficit.
Voters should approve a bond levy for TriMet because of the wonderful job they do.
Funny how Frieman Randy and company while attemopting to get this boost forfire are also among the many politicians who enable the gross fiscal madness at TriMet, PDC and other quagmires.
Posted by Ben | July 16, 2010 8:04 AM
Why not? Randy saw he could stick us for 30% more for water the last two years after hitting us for 30+ year bump in property taxes for PFDR, so he must think he can get away with anything.
Besides we really need to finish that TriMet bridge so we can watch the Sellwood collapse after attending the soocer game at the new $100M expansion on the stadium after two MLS seasons on the solar powered streetcars.
Posted by Steve | July 16, 2010 8:19 AM
Nice kids you've got there. It'd be a shame if they caught fire.
Posted by Allan L. | July 16, 2010 9:01 AM
Give me a tax increase or I'll torch this puppy!
Posted by Mister Tee | July 16, 2010 9:14 AM
I think people would be more likely to support a bond for a new fire station than a new school. Who doesn't like firefighters, right? That thing will pass easy.
Posted by dg | July 16, 2010 9:29 AM
I saw the Portland Fire and Rescue chief describing the current sorry state of equipment last night on the news. He talked about a 20 year old truck still in use with an 11-page repair history. Why wait till now to pursue this? Why didn't this get addressed year's ago? Why isn't the chief in an uproar about the mismanagement of resources by city administrators, past and present? Why was he so polite?
If the news camera were on me, I would not be able to hold my tongue. This issue is no joke, peoples lives and property are at risk. These cavalier politicians are "playing with fire" with their fiscal irresponsibility. I guess fire fighting equipment isn't as sexy as gigantic, roof top neon roses.
Posted by SKA | July 16, 2010 9:43 AM
This all started when a Seattle fire truck had mechanical problems. So brain-trust Randy got the idea how he could spend more taxpayers money, look good to his union base, and show us who is boss. It didn't occur to him to phase in new trucks and communication over time in a fiscally responsible way that did not add a burden to ratepayers. It keeps it out of his budget so he can bankrupt the retirement fund and cost shift over to property owners.
No doubt he is cackling today just how stupid we are to buy into something even he doesn't believe. What a dishonest piece of work. And y'all are going to enable him some more.
Posted by Davey Tristen | July 16, 2010 9:43 AM
That thing will pass easy.
Especially since the city gets to write the ballot language. They'll hit the usual hot buttons: it's essential for public safety (bad things will happen if we don't get the money), it's only pennies per $1,000 of assessed value, and oh look! An eco-roof on the new fire station! Way cool!
It sounds like there's some necessary stuff to fund in this bond, but I'm with Amanda-it should have been budgeted for out of general revenues in the normal process.
Poor Nick Fish: he plays by the rules and runs polls and holds back his Parks levy. Meanwhile, Randy just charges ahead and does whatever he wants.
Posted by Eric | July 16, 2010 9:50 AM
Now if we could just get those firemen to ride bikes...
Posted by dman | July 16, 2010 10:11 AM
Right-o, Allan L. --
Fires happen....Things burn....
[The SamRand Bros.]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRm5WcjOikQ
Posted by Mojo | July 16, 2010 10:31 AM
People, people: you've overlooked the most important point.
The building would have an eco-roof.
And I have news for Commissioner Leonard: this voter "gets it” very well, and damn well resents being put in the position of having to vote against public safety.
Posted by ER | July 16, 2010 10:35 AM
Maybe they could put the Fire Bureau under Trimet, so they can use federal transportation dollars to fund it!
Or even better, the water bureau! Hey, those tankers have to fill up with city water, right?
Posted by Jon | July 16, 2010 12:22 PM
I may have to move back just long enough to vote against this.
Posted by pdxmick | July 16, 2010 12:55 PM
This one will go down in a big, spectacular ball of flames. Bring it on, Randy.
Posted by RJBob | July 16, 2010 2:06 PM
If there is organized opposition to Sam/Rands stupidity, I will certainly be contributing over $500 dollars. It is time for us naysayers, complainers, not-seeing-the-big-picture, or whatever they want to call us, to put a stop to this insanity.
The $500, if passed, is what in 5 years I'll be contributing to a green fire station in additional taxes. If many of us calculate what we'd be paying extra and use it to defeat this bond, we'd be doing this city a good deed.
Randy could pay for the $72 Million he's asking for by not paying 20 fire fighters who are on disability that play golf every friday and build houses for their friends. I'll be doing this for the real children.
Posted by lw | July 16, 2010 2:37 PM
There are many people who have not seen the Randy Leonard Mayor Creepy video.
The two of them have replaced the notion of being dignified with humiliating behavior.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMnY5FAKhl4
Posted by Ben | July 16, 2010 3:02 PM
We already know Mr. Leonard believes he can get away with anything. I wish I'd saved the news clipping, but a few years ago he was quoted as saying "Portlanders will pay for anything as long as they know it's the right thing to do". And of course, City Hall always has a handy self-serving study or report from (who?) to make sure we know what's right since we're just stupid customers, er... residents that can't figure it out for ourselves.
His statement and the attitude behind it says a lot.
Posted by JC | July 16, 2010 4:01 PM
Here is another golden nugget worth delving into. Why waste anymore money on this when we spent $$$ making a state permitting system that works just fine. We don't need no stinken new permit system.
http://djcoregon.com/news/2010/07/15/bds-wants-new-electronic-permitting-system/
Posted by Slappy | July 16, 2010 7:30 PM
This could well go down in flames.... I will be working with my friends who will work with their friends and perhaps enough grass roots will kill it.
Posted by LucsAdvo | July 17, 2010 6:26 AM
This isn't a bond for "essential services;" what the heck? The Fire Bureau already has a full fleet of vehicles to continue responding the way they have for years since taking over medical first response. This is to transition from using trucks and engines--in service and available, but designed primarily for firefighting--to more use-specific vehicles that cost much less, are faster to deploy, and can be equipped for a variety of non-fire calls.
There's nothing "essential" about this, site owner. It's an investment in an improved and more efficient department--but if the money is not voted, they can go right on responding as they have been. I support the idea because over the medium and long term it will save the city a lot of money, but it's less essential than remaking the city for transportation in the 21st century and getting away from throwing money down the drain at the car culture.
Posted by whatthe? | July 17, 2010 7:30 AM
Whatthe ? -
You are confusing PFRB and Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue.
TVRF is in process of testing exactly the kind of equipment you describe.
In Portland, Fireman randy has already declared, without any test or evaluation, that PFRB has no need for any different (note that "different" does not equate with "new") and has no interest in looking at smaller faster vehicles with smaller crew numbers.
PFRB Chief John Klum, who really likes his job, has said nothing abot long term savings by going to smaller faster vehicles and smaller crews. Klum knows how things work under Fireman Randy.
Posted by Nonny Mouse | July 17, 2010 8:36 AM
Whatthe?/ Randy,
Why didn't you bring this up during the budget process this spring? Always wait until the last minute so you can push something through as an "emergency" or a "just in time" ballot item.
Live within your means for once and phase new things in over time. In "investing" it's like "dollar cost averaging". Maybe take an economics course while you're at it. Site owner and Nonny Mouse get it, why can't you?
Posted by Fred S. | July 17, 2010 9:33 AM
I realize the money is probably coming from somewhere else and *dedicated* to a couple of fire museums but how can that kind of spending be justified when there are apparently glaring infrastructure needs which should be addressed first?
Sort of like gold-plating the Titanic as it approaches the 'berg.
Posted by NW Portlander | July 17, 2010 9:40 AM
Those sure look like newer, smaller vehicles in the picture provided by the Oregonian...
Posted by whatthe? | July 18, 2010 6:47 AM
Whatthe? / randy
Oregonian photo, July 9 at:
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/07/portland_city_council_to_ponde.html
Full size engine (pumper to east coast folks) wearing a nice PFRB livery.
Oregonian photo, July 15
http://mobile.oregonlive.com/advorg/db_96618/contentdetail.htm;jsessionid=4D874148BFE55AFC96F9EC42...
Again, full size truck.
TVFR is using some very interesting large 4x 4 vehicles either Suburbans or Toyota FJ Cruisers, for many runs, after having experimented with borrowed Oregon ANG Hummers during the two weeks of snow storms in December 2009 to get to incidents in the Wash Co side of the West Hills when "regular" fire trucks couldn't get through. Gresham at that time (December, 2009) did the same thing.
Port;and, with the same sort of topographical challenges in SW was not interested then, or since, in looking at more maneuverable or smaller units.regular
When pushed hard on the issue, management at PFRB responded thatthe Commissioner wasn't interested in anything that might result in smaller vrews, and that the commissioner wanted more stations with large crews.
Randy never has never stopped being a union shill, regardless of the excess costs often accompanying his shilling for the union.
Certainly not a person who has grown into the role of a Commissioner purporting to represent the best interests of all the residents and taxpayers of PDX.
And now he thinks he'll be Mayor in name as well as in fact...
Posted by Nonny Mouse | July 18, 2010 11:06 AM
It may be that as the agenda of adding more density yet comes on, that the issue of fire safety now cannot be ignored and smaller vehicles are needed to get into these tight spots, flag lots, etc. As the code changes into tighter and tighter densities, the smaller vehicles may be required for safety.
Seconds can make a difference between life and death and I am surprised that the whole matter of fire safety in all this infill has not been at the forefront of the density problems. Traffic congestion as well.
Posted by clinamen | July 18, 2010 11:54 AM
The problems are the irresponsible and arrogant actions of Leonard for not bringing it up during the budget process. Once again trying to put the community against the wall because of poor planning. We should not give him the media time he covets so much, and just vote no. Tell him if it's so important put it in the next budget. It can wait while we see the results of other communities.
Once again Nonny Mouse gets an 'A'.
Posted by Travis D. | July 18, 2010 12:34 PM
Didn't Mayor Potter push thru funding to upgrade all the emergency personnel radios to 900 Mhz?
Posted by Mister Tee | July 19, 2010 7:28 PM